Bug 1213648 - dracut: implement no implicit initrd location
Summary: dracut: implement no implicit initrd location
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Basesystem (show other bugs)
Version: Current
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: dracut maintainers
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-07-25 15:13 UTC by Ludwig Nussel
Modified: 2024-04-18 15:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ludwig Nussel 2023-07-25 15:13:14 UTC
I'm working on systemd-boot integration in Factory. An effect of how it's currently done is that dracut basically cannot know where to install the initrd and it should not do it anyway. See https://github.com/lnussel/sdbootutil/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md for an overview.

So to avoid users (or scriptlets) generating useless initrds, would it be possible to implement a global config option to disable guessing of the location? Ie always require to specify an output file when that option is set.
Comment 1 Antonio Feijoo 2023-07-26 09:39:15 UTC
(In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #0)
> So to avoid users (or scriptlets) generating useless initrds, would it be
> possible to implement a global config option to disable guessing of the
> location? Ie always require to specify an output file when that option is
> set.

You know it could be possible :), the question is whether it'd be accepted upstream (knowing how they breathe...), because specifying an output file already disables guessing.
Comment 2 Ludwig Nussel 2023-07-26 09:52:07 UTC
the point would be to prevent admins to naively type "dracut" from generating an initrd in a useless location
Comment 3 Antonio Feijoo 2023-07-26 12:44:41 UTC
Here it is, but I wouldn't bet a lot of money: https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/2448

We had a "similar" PR rejected in the past: https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/2020
Comment 4 Antonio Feijoo 2023-08-16 07:24:04 UTC
Changing severity to enhancement, I'd say that the current behavior is not a bug, since the output file can be specified explicitly.
Comment 5 Antonio Feijoo 2024-03-25 08:57:07 UTC
(In reply to Antonio Feijoo from comment #3)
> Here it is, but I wouldn't bet a lot of money:
> https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/2448

I'd say that this PR will not be merged. Is there still any interest in keeping this enhancement request open or has sdbootutil already found a workaround for this?
Comment 6 Ludwig Nussel 2024-03-25 09:05:07 UTC
There can't be a workaround in sdbootutil. The issue is people can call dracut manually any time and it would create an initrd. The result is useless as the new initrd won't be used for anything. In the systemd-boot case it's simply not dracut's job to register the initrd with the bootloader. Tooling around dracut takes care to install the generated initrd in the right location.
Anyway dracut generating initrd in random places is not harmful or blocking anything, just useless :-)
Comment 7 Antonio Feijoo 2024-04-18 15:00:05 UTC
The patch from https://github.com/openSUSE/dracut/pull/323 is included since snapshot 20240417.