Bug 1216023 - kio_* packages should be renamed to kio-*.
Summary: kio_* packages should be renamed to kio-*.
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed
Classification: openSUSE
Component: KDE Applications (show other bugs)
Version: Current
Hardware: All openSUSE Tumbleweed
: P5 - None : Enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-Mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL: https://discuss.kde.org/t/kio-package...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-10-07 17:12 UTC by roke beedell
Modified: 2023-11-06 17:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description roke beedell 2023-10-07 17:12:22 UTC
Per https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE%3AFactory/kio_audiocd#comment-1828329, locating the `kio_audiocd` package with `zypper` is difficult due to its naming contrasting its `kio-*` counterparts. I believe that this should be rectified by renaming `kio_audiocd` to `kio-audiocd`.

Per https://discuss.kde.org/t/kio-packages-named-inconsistently/5598/4?u=rokejulianlockhart, other prominent distributions use the more consistent upstream moniker:

*   https://packages.debian.org/sid/kde/kio-audiocd
*   https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/kio-audiocd
Comment 1 hui 2023-10-07 20:53:15 UTC
A basic search shows that there are more kio packages with an underline:

kio_audiocd
kio_audiocd-devel
kio_audiocd-lang
kio_iso
kio_kamera
kio_perldoc
kio_perldoc-lang
Comment 2 roke beedell 2023-10-07 23:03:58 UTC
(In reply to hui from comment #1)
> A basic search shows that there are more kio packages with an underline:
> 
> kio_audiocd
> kio_audiocd-devel
> kio_audiocd-lang
> kio_iso
> kio_kamera
> kio_perldoc
> kio_perldoc-lang

I'd like to expand the scope of the bug to encompass all of those too, then. Apologies for not checking beforehand.

Although an underscore is a more normal naming convention, upstream appears to use hyphens, so I believe that we should replicate that in the interest of reducing unnecessary inconsistency between upstream versus downstream and other distributions.
Comment 3 Christophe Marin 2023-11-06 17:19:16 UTC
We discussed about it, we won't rename the existing packages.