Bug 1218280 - [Build :30718:rubygem-actionpack-5_1] openQA test fails in hawk_gui
Summary: [Build :30718:rubygem-actionpack-5_1] openQA test fails in hawk_gui
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1215707
Alias: None
Product: PUBLIC SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: package coldpool
QA Contact:
URL: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13079303...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-12-20 16:19 UTC by Michele Pagot
Modified: 2024-01-04 10:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: openQA
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: Yes
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
journal (368.02 KB, text/x-log)
2023-12-20 16:19 UTC, Michele Pagot 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michele Pagot 2023-12-20 16:19:17 UTC 
Created attachment 871495 [details]
journal

## Observation

openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Server-DVD-HA-Incidents-x86_64-qam_ha_hawk_client@64bit fails in
[hawk_gui](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13079303/modules/hawk_gui/steps/406)

Web interface is stuck in Add Cluster page

## Test suite description
The base test suite is used for job templates defined in YAML documents. It has no settings of its own.


## Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build [:30718:rubygem-actionpack-5_1](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13079303) (current job)


## Expected result

Last good: [:31906:yast2-network](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13078474) (or more recent)


## Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Server-DVD-HA-Incidents&machine=64bit&test=qam_ha_hawk_client&version=15-SP5)
Comment 1 Petr Gajdos 2024-01-04 10:16:30 UTC 
Isn't that duplicate of bug 1215707?
Comment 2 Petr Gajdos 2024-01-04 10:26:20 UTC 
Yeah, it seems so. If not, please reopen.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1215707 ***