Bugzilla – Bug 121836
Everytime a package is installed (or YOU update the system), /etc/fonts/suse-hinting.conf is reseted
Last modified: 2005-10-10 10:39:24 UTC
Hi, All is in the title. I've just launch a YOU update and my fonts are now ugly cause the less_eq value for MS TT Core Fonts in /etc/fonts/suse-hinting.conf as been switched back from 18 (the value I previously set) to 0 (the initial value). It's quite annoying and it happen too when I install new packages.
That's not a bug, see the comment at the top of the file: <!-- Generated by SuSEconfig.fonts, don't edit, your changes will get lost. --> <!-- Edit /etc/sysconfig/fonts-config instead. --> <!-- Or put rules into your personal config file ~/.fonts.conf. --> That means you should *not* edit that file to get your prefered value of 18 for the limit to use the byte code interpreter for the MS webfonts, you should put this into /etc/sysconfig/fonts-config. Like this: ## Path: Desktop ## Description: Display font configuration ## Type: integer ## Default: 0 # # Fonts which have high quality byte code interpreter instructions # can look very good in small sizes when rendered in black and white # (no anti-aliasing!) using the byte code interpreter (not the autohinter!). # The results look as good as high quality bitmap fonts. # # If you want to use this rendering style by default for all fonts # which are known to have good byte code instructions (these are the # fonts from the agfa-fonts package and the Microsoft webfonts), enter # an integer number greater than 0 here. For example, if you enter "18", # black and white rendering using the byte code interpreter will be used # for pixel sizes <= 18, for larger sizes the autohinter and anti-aliasing # will be used. You can disable this by entering "0". # BYTECODE_BW_MAX_PIXEL="18" Closing as INVALID.
Sorry for the wrong bug report. I haven't read the file header as there were no problem with RC1 and that was the methode given in another bug report ;o) I will update my OpenSuse WIKI topic about MS TT Core Fonts soon ;o) Regards
I have explained this in bug #114949 already and you were in the CC: all the time. See for example comment #6 and comment #13 for example in bug #114949.