Bug 134588 - no /dev/cdrom
Summary: no /dev/cdrom
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 135342
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Version: Alpha 3
Hardware: PowerPC Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christian Zoz
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-20 19:27 UTC by peter czanik
Modified: 2005-11-29 15:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
55-cdrom.rules (153 bytes, text/plain)
2005-11-25 08:04 UTC, peter czanik 		Details
hwinfo ---block (7.75 KB, text/plain)
2005-11-25 08:04 UTC, peter czanik 		Details
for a in /sys/block/[sh]*; do udevinfo -q all -p $a; done (913 bytes, text/plain)
2005-11-25 08:06 UTC, peter czanik 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description peter czanik 2005-11-20 19:27:47 UTC 
On my Pegasos, when I try eject, I get an error:

linux:~ # eject
eject: unable to find or open device for: `/dev/cdrom'

And it's true, there is no such file, as /dev/cdrom
Comment 1 Christian Zoz 2005-11-24 08:31:24 UTC 
Please show me:
- content of file /etc/udev/rules.d/*-cdrom.rules
- output of 'for a in /sys/block/[sh]*; do udevinfo -q all -p $a; done'
- output of 'hwinfo --block'
Please don't put this info into bugzilla comment but _attach_ it as 'text/plain'.
Comment 2 Danny Al-Gaaf 2005-11-24 16:31:13 UTC 
@christian: this is maybe a dup of #135342
Comment 3 peter czanik 2005-11-25 08:04:03 UTC 
Created attachment 58656 [details]
55-cdrom.rules
Comment 4 peter czanik 2005-11-25 08:04:39 UTC 
Created attachment 58657 [details]
hwinfo ---block
Comment 5 peter czanik 2005-11-25 08:06:08 UTC 
Created attachment 58658 [details]
for a in /sys/block/[sh]*; do udevinfo -q all -p $a; done
Comment 6 Christian Zoz 2005-11-25 10:17:15 UTC 
Peter, see comment 2
Please try to move 55-cdrom.rules to 65-cdrom.rules to find out if it is a duplicate of bug 135342
Comment 7 peter czanik 2005-11-27 18:54:52 UTC 
Yes, it is, as it solved the problem.
Comment 8 Christian Zoz 2005-11-29 15:33:32 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 135342 ***