Bug 140334 - YOU always queries mirror servers, forgets configured server.
Summary: YOU always queries mirror servers, forgets configured server.
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: YOU (show other bugs)
Version: Final
Hardware: All SuSE Linux 10.0
: P5 - None : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-20 14:46 UTC by Heiko Selber
Modified: 2005-12-22 10:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Customer
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Heiko Selber 2005-12-20 14:46:16 UTC 
My company provides YOU patches on an FTP server in its INTRAnet, to which a couple of Linux computers (administered by me) are connected.

They don't have access to the INTERnet, though (and won't ever get).

When I run YOU, it tries to query for mirror servers until it times out (after about 10 minutes).

Only then can I enter the URL of our intranet server and download patches.

Whenever I run YOU, I must wait for the timeout to pass and enter the URL anew. Perhaps a write to the server list fails because the initial download of the server list has failed, so there is none?

This is quite annoying when using the GUI and (even worse) makes it impossible to use the automated update.

I observed this behaviour with SuSE 9.3 and 10.0.

Please restore the behaviour of SuSE 8.2, where the query for mirrors is done only on request, and where YOU did not forget any URL entered.
Comment 1 Klaus Kämpf 2005-12-20 14:53:06 UTC 
set YAST2_LOADFTPSERVER="no" in /etc/sysconfig/onlineupdate
Comment 2 Klaus Kämpf 2005-12-20 14:53:42 UTC 
btw, this sounds more like a support request instead of a bug report ...
Comment 3 Heiko Selber 2005-12-22 10:49:05 UTC 
I admit that it can be viewed as a support request. It is perhaps a matter of perspective.

On the other hand, it might be considered a bug that it is not possible to configure the behaviour of a GUI application in the GUI itself (or rather that it is only *partially* possible, which looks a bit inconsistent).

Thank you for the reply anyway, and I apologize for any inconvenience.