Bug 141226 - missing alsa devices in hal
Summary: missing alsa devices in hal
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Basesystem (show other bugs)
Version: Alpha 4
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Takashi Iwai
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-03 13:28 UTC by Ludwig Nussel
Modified: 2006-01-05 18:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
lshal output (98.63 KB, text/plain)
2006-01-03 13:57 UTC, Ludwig Nussel 		Details
l -R /sys/class/sound (4.90 KB, text/plain)
2006-01-03 13:58 UTC, Ludwig Nussel 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ludwig Nussel 2006-01-03 13:28:24 UTC 
/dev/snd/pcm* are not listend in hal anymore with kernel 2.6.15-20060103094928-default. I suppose it's because their sysfs nodes have moved from /sys/class/sound/ to /sys/class/sound/controlC0/.
Comment 1 Danny Al-Gaaf 2006-01-03 13:45:36 UTC 
I hate this f*****g changes in the kernel with each new version.

I have currently no machine with this kernelversion here atm. Could you please attach the output of lshal and of "grep . /sys/class/sound/*/*".
Comment 2 Ludwig Nussel 2006-01-03 13:57:02 UTC 
Created attachment 61884 [details]
lshal output

> grep . /sys/class/sound/*/* 2>/dev/null 
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev:14:12
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev:14:4
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev:116:3
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev:14:3
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev:14:0
/sys/class/sound/seq/dev:116:10
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev:116:2
Comment 3 Ludwig Nussel 2006-01-03 13:58:33 UTC 
Created attachment 61885 [details]
l -R /sys/class/sound

maybe moving the devices was an accident? That's why I CC'd Takashi.
Comment 4 Danny Al-Gaaf 2006-01-03 14:06:51 UTC 
This looks a littlebit strange for me. Why are all PCM devices now under the controlC0 device. @ludwig: you are maybe right, looks for me like a accident.

@Takashi: any ideas?
Comment 5 Takashi Iwai 2006-01-03 19:18:50 UTC 
It's not an accident, but I just overlooked what the patch really does.
Yes, it looks strange.  I'll roll back the patch, so no need to fix from the HAL side.
Comment 6 Danny Al-Gaaf 2006-01-04 09:50:30 UTC 
Sounds good for me ;-). Are there any changes planed for the alsa sysfs interface for 10.1 or Code 10?
Comment 7 Takashi Iwai 2006-01-05 18:18:48 UTC 
No, unless something is missing from HAL/udev side, we have no plan to change the current design.