Bugzilla – Bug 142490
VUL-0: bogofilter heap overflow
Last modified: 2009-10-13 20:47:17 UTC
The issue is public. Name CVE-2005-4591 (under review) Status Candidate Description Heap-based buffer overflow in bogofilter 0.96.2, 0.95.2, 0.94.14, 0.94.12, and other versions from 0.93.5 to 0.96.2, when using Unicode databases, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via "invalid input sequences" that lead to heap corruption when bogofilter or bogolexer converts character sets. [14]References * CONFIRM:http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2005-01 * BID:16171 * URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16171 * FRSIRT:ADV-2006-0100 * URL:http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/0100 * SECUNIA:18352 * URL:http://secunia.com/advisories/18352
Name CVE-2005-4592 (under review) Status Candidate Description Heap-based buffer overflow in bogofilter and bogolexer 0.96.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via words that are longer than the input buffer used by flex. [14]References * CONFIRM:http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2005-02 * BID:16171 * URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16171 * FRSIRT:ADV-2006-0100 * URL:http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/0100 * SECUNIA:18352 * URL:http://secunia.com/advisories/18352
http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2005-01 and http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2005-02 suggests to upgrade to 1.0.1. Andreas: Is this ok for all our products? Non other package depends on bogofilter.
Fixed package provided to the CODE 10 tree.
1.0.1 builds fine for 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, and 10.0.
I'd like to see a patch for this.
Created attachment 64518 [details] Patch for version 0.96.2
SL bogofilter vulnerable CVE-2005-4591 CVE-2005-4592 9.1 0.16.4 no no 9.2 0.92.8 no no 9.3 0.94.12 yes no 10.0 0.95.2 yes no => we only have to care about 9.3 and 10.0
Andreas: I've added the requested patch with comment #6. The patch has to backported for both affected SL products. Backport or version update?
Backport
Then I hand it over to Ludwig as I don't have the time.
Maintenance-Tracker-3410
updates released
CVE-2005-4592: CVSS v2 Base Score: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P)