Bug 144303 - After update 10.0 -> 10.1beta1, mutt fails to send mails
Summary: After update 10.0 -> 10.1beta1, mutt fails to send mails
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 144091
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Network (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 1
Hardware: x86-64 Other
: P5 - None : Critical (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Varkoly
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-20 10:26 UTC by Klaus Kämpf
Modified: 2006-01-20 11:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:26:14 UTC
Looks like sendmail can't cope with some IPv6 stuff 

sendmail: warning: unexpected data in /proc/net/if_inet6 - skipping IPv6 configuration
sendmail: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for ::1
Comment 1 Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:32:11 UTC
Argh, sorry. The error message comes from mutt.
My system doesn't have sendmail installed but postfix.

-> mmj
Comment 2 Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:45:23 UTC
Putting "unset use_ipv6" does NOT help
Comment 3 Mads Martin Joergensen 2006-01-20 10:47:29 UTC
o, that's postfix error log. And it's due to this line from /etc/postfix/main.cf:

inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1 ::1

mutt error messages is not in /var/log/mail, but when using mutt.
Comment 4 Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:50:05 UTC
Looks like postfix is buggy. "rcpostfix start" fails also 
Comment 5 Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:52:05 UTC
Hmm, it fails if I replace
POSTFIX_RELAYHOST="relay.suse.de"
with
POSTFIX_RELAYHOST="149.44.160.155"

in /etc/sysconfig/postfix
Comment 6 Klaus Kämpf 2006-01-20 10:53:07 UTC
Mads was right. Replacing
inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1 ::1
with
inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1
in /etc/postfix/main.cf fixes this bug
Comment 7 Peter Varkoly 2006-01-20 11:20:34 UTC
Fixed: #144091

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 144091 ***