Bug 147878 - AppArmor usermode packages should be installed by default for text only systems
Summary: AppArmor usermode packages should be installed by default for text only systems
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: AppArmor (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: All Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Steve Beattie
QA Contact: Dominic W Reynolds
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-02 23:53 UTC by Tony Jones
Modified: 2006-02-07 20:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Development
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tony Jones 2006-02-02 23:53:46 UTC 
Currently they are only auto selected if you select Gnome etc based installs.
Comment 1 Steve Beattie 2006-02-03 17:21:13 UTC 
Tony: SLES 10 beta3 or SL 10.1 beta3? Note that either way, assigning the bug to me does no good, as I have no control over the package selections.

Stefan: I was able to reproduce this in SL 10.1 beta 3, selecting a minimal X install resulted in the apparmor packages not being installed. Are you the right person to fix this?
Comment 2 Tony Jones 2006-02-03 18:37:06 UTC 
Steve. I just assigned to you and figured you could reassign as necessary.  Maybe this was a stupid thing to do. 

Yes, should be SL10.1 Beta 3 also.  Not sure if it's an issue in SLES10 also.
Comment 3 Christian Boltz 2006-02-03 19:36:34 UTC 
Tony, it seems you forgot to set the bug back to ASSIGNED ;-)
Comment 4 Stefan Dirsch 2006-02-06 04:15:51 UTC 
Steve, "Minimal X install" is *not* the "default" installation. AppArmor packages are only in "default" (KDE/Gnome) installations.
Comment 5 Steve Beattie 2006-02-07 20:35:41 UTC 
Hmm, okay, I hadn't realized that was the interpretation of what "default" meant. Our stock set of profiles are mostly server oriented, so to me it makes sense if apparmor (at least the apparmor-parser and apparmor-profiles packages) are installed on a text-only installation.

(My understanding is that lrupp moved the parser and profiles packages to disc 1 so it wouldn't break that aspect of the minimal text-only install, but that may have been sles only.)

Marking closed as INVALID. Thanks for clarifying, Stefan.