Bug 147881 - Installing apparmor user packages should install auditd
Summary: Installing apparmor user packages should install auditd
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Selections (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: All Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Stefan Dirsch
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-02 23:57 UTC by Tony Jones
Modified: 2006-02-03 18:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Development
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tony Jones 2006-02-02 23:57:00 UTC 
Audit framework should be installed if apparmor is installed.
Comment 1 Thorsten Kukuk 2006-02-03 06:49:21 UTC 
If you don't deselct it yourself, it will be installed.
So what did you do?
Comment 2 Tony Jones 2006-02-03 07:03:39 UTC 
Minimal install, text-only (no gnome nor X).
This does not install AppArmor user packages nor audit.
Installing AppArmor from Yast does not install audit.
Comment 3 Tony Jones 2006-02-03 07:07:24 UTC 
Oops, meant to file this against SL10.1 beta3, not SLES10 beta3.  Apologies.
Comment 4 Thorsten Kukuk 2006-02-03 07:27:08 UTC 
Stefan, does SL have an AppArmor selection? if yes, please add audit.

If not, this is something we have solve later, we agreed on not adding a hard requies, since not everybody wishes to have audit running.
Comment 5 Stefan Dirsch 2006-02-03 09:27:47 UTC 
There's no AppArmor selection for SL, but all the important AppArmor packages
are in our default selection. Among these is audit as well.
Comment 6 Steve Beattie 2006-02-03 16:59:33 UTC 
Ah, okay, I'll drop our local patch to add the requires:. I wasn't aware that an explicit decision was made to not have a dependency on audit.

Thanks.
Comment 7 Tony Jones 2006-02-03 17:01:46 UTC 
Issue still remains that nothing was installed when asking for a non graphical system.
Comment 8 Steve Beattie 2006-02-03 17:13:49 UTC 
Tony: that's covered under this bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=147878 no?
Comment 9 Tony Jones 2006-02-03 18:42:56 UTC 
Correct. #147878 can be used to track it.

Hopefully noone will be stupid enough to deselect audit from the detailed packages installed by the default list, as far as I understand, Yast won't detect that this is an issue for the AppArmor packages.