Bug 151163 - firefox does use wrong theme under KDE
Summary: firefox does use wrong theme under KDE
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
: 171920 (view as bug list)
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Firefox (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 4
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Wolfgang Rosenauer
QA Contact: Stefan Dirsch
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-15 14:06 UTC by Adrian Schröter
Modified: 2006-05-08 12:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
patch (2.74 KB, patch)
2006-05-04 14:44 UTC, Wolfgang Rosenauer 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adrian Schröter 2006-02-15 14:06:06 UTC 
Firefox does not use the right theme under KDE anymore. A result is also the wrong button order of dialogs.
Comment 1 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-02-15 14:13:13 UTC 
The plastikfox theme does exist since only in an alpha version which isn't stable according to the creator. Also the Novell Industrial theme is not available.
So we have only the default theme at the moment.
Comment 3 Forgotten User V1uFYNo6tR 2006-04-10 12:36:34 UTC 
I've just released Plastikfox 2.0 beta, so you may include it now if it's still on-time.
Comment 4 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-04-10 15:20:03 UTC 
Thanks Victor. I'm integrating the theme now. We have no guarantee to get it in but we'll see.
We will not choose it by default most likely but package it along so that the user can easily switch to it.
Comment 8 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-04-25 09:35:39 UTC 
I'm trying to hard to get this resolved because all the gtkqtengine crashers but it still doesn't work as expected :-(
Comment 9 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-05-04 14:43:25 UTC 
I think I got it.
But most likely too late for 10.1.
I'll attach the patch for Robert to review it.
Comment 10 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-05-04 14:44:28 UTC 
Created attachment 82040 [details]
patch
Comment 11 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-05-04 14:49:07 UTC 
*** Bug 171920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Robert O'Callahan 2006-05-05 03:38:28 UTC 
It's ugly, but it's OK. I wouldn't take it upstream.
Comment 13 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-05-08 12:57:50 UTC 
submitted for SLE10 rc1