Bug 154503 - NFS installation: CD2 could not be mounted, no retry possible
Summary: NFS installation: CD2 could not be mounted, no retry possible
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: libzypp (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 6
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Klaus Kämpf
QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 140732
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-03-01 20:22 UTC by Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x
Modified: 2006-04-05 19:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Component Test
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
yast2logs, from "save_y2logs" (3.68 MB, application/x-tgz)
2006-03-01 20:23 UTC, Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-03-01 20:22:52 UTC
After reboot into stage2, i got a "Media error", with "OK", "Abort", "Skip" options.
OK did not retry the failed NFS mount, so CD2 was skipped.

y2logs attached, search for "CD2" in y2log.
Comment 1 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-03-01 20:23:39 UTC
Created attachment 70863 [details]
yast2logs, from "save_y2logs"
Comment 2 Stanislav Visnovsky 2006-03-02 15:11:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154343 ***
Comment 3 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-03-02 17:14:10 UTC
I don't think this is a duplicate for the following reasons:
- for some yet unknown reason, CD1 directory could not be mounted by NFS.
  I verified this during installation with "mount" - no nfs directory was
  mounted. => CD1 failed
- Then it proceeded to CD2, which could be mounted, and it installed from CD3,
  CD4 and CD5 until the end. Just CD2 was missing.

Marco and me actually reproduced this on SL10.1 beta6 - by strategically unplugging the network cable after reboot into stage2, shortly after the X server came up:-)
Comment 4 Stanislav Visnovsky 2006-03-03 08:45:37 UTC
But beta6 on SL10.1 still tries to access the original source, while
SLES 10 beta6 will not and thus the original problem cannot be reproduce.

Try to do the same with SLES10.
Comment 5 Andreas Jaeger 2006-04-05 19:04:06 UTC
no reaction for a month - resolving as invalid.
Comment 6 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-04-05 19:55:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> no reaction for a month - resolving as invalid.

it is probably just fixed in the mean time, since i have not seen something like that ever since.
I have not retried exactly this scenario, but similar stuff.