Bug 157876 - The GNOME Terminal (Traditional Chinese ) Manual Version is different from the one of English
Summary: The GNOME Terminal (Traditional Chinese ) Manual Version is different from t...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: GNOME (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 6
Hardware: x86 SuSE Linux 10.1
: P5 - None : Minor (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-14 09:11 UTC by Wayne Lu
Modified: 2006-03-19 18:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Chinese-Version (62.39 KB, image/x-png)
2006-03-14 09:13 UTC, Wayne Lu 		Details
English-Version (286.26 KB, image/x-png)
2006-03-14 09:14 UTC, Wayne Lu 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Lu 2006-03-14 09:11:30 UTC 
Step 
1.Open the Gnome Terminal Manual

Expected Result:
the Version is the same as V2.8

Actual Result:

the Version is V2.3
Comment 1 Wayne Lu 2006-03-14 09:13:31 UTC 
Created attachment 72721 [details]
Chinese-Version
Comment 2 Wayne Lu 2006-03-14 09:14:31 UTC 
Created attachment 72722 [details]
English-Version
Comment 3 Karl Eichwalder 2006-03-14 10:13:26 UTC 
Something newer probably does not exist.  GNOME is going to switch to xml2po.  Then you will see untranslated part of sections that were not updated.  I think we can resolve the bug as "worksforme" (= we are not responsible for updating third party provided translations).
Comment 4 Stanislav Brabec 2006-03-14 11:20:48 UTC 
Yes. We do not provide GNOME applications documentation. If you want to get this fixed, you have to report this problem to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ or contact directly Chinese translation author.

Then you could paste the upstream bug here for reference.
Comment 5 JP Rosevear 2006-03-19 18:49:54 UTC 
As per comments, this needs to be handled upstream.