Bug 159660 - root partition too small
Summary: root partition too small
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 158785
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Installation (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 8
Hardware: x86-64 SuSE Linux 10.1
: P5 - None : Blocker (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-21 08:12 UTC by Hans Witvliet
Modified: 2006-03-25 16:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Beta-Customer
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
uitput from fdisk (844 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2006-03-24 11:11 UTC, Hans Witvliet
Details
uitput from fdisk (844 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2006-03-24 11:11 UTC, Hans Witvliet
Details
logfile from yast2 (1.01 MB, text/plain)
2006-03-24 11:18 UTC, Hans Witvliet
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hans Witvliet 2006-03-21 08:12:33 UTC
Firstly, I am aware of the current discussion on the list about minimal root partition. However, that is about the DEFAULT size....

As stated on the list, i was brought up with the idea that file systems with different purpose *must* have their own partition, and i still teach this to new people in my department.
</preamble>

Started an instattion woth verified & tested media on a new Dell 830 server.
Intended partition layout (firt run):
/boot 100MB
swap 1GB
/    1GB
/home 1GB
/opt 5GB
/srv 50GB
/tmp 1GB
/usr 10GB
/var 5GB
Software selection: all minus laptop or mobile)
Complaint from yast: 
root usage 616% used 6.2GB free -5.2GB
Failed to install

Suggestion made by yast: Continue anyway
selected: YES (as /usr partition large enough)
Still refuses to install
==========================================================
next try (after reboot) try to avoid it by using lvm
/boot 100MB
swap 1GB
/    500MB
LVM  70 GB
logical volumes:
/usr  10GB
/var   5GB
/tmp   1GB
/home  1GB
/srv  30GB

Again, root partition way to small, refuses to install.
NOTE: during software selection module, yast does see all the partitions
and shows the correct provided size, but indicates foor all other partitions a usage of 0%.

Yes, i know one could create one huge root partition, install everything in it,
create a decent partition layout and copy evrything back into it.
But as this was working in beta-6 I presume that this is a typo during the calculation of the DEFAULT root size.

One should always be able to overrule suggested defaults, not?
I indicated this as blocker, as this should *NOT* go into production.

Hans
Comment 1 Michael Gross 2006-03-21 14:31:14 UTC
Please attach the yast logfiles (/var/log/YaST2) as well as `fdisk -l'.
Comment 2 Hans Witvliet 2006-03-24 11:11:48 UTC
Created attachment 74886 [details]
uitput from fdisk
Comment 3 Hans Witvliet 2006-03-24 11:11:54 UTC
Created attachment 74887 [details]
uitput from fdisk
Comment 4 Hans Witvliet 2006-03-24 11:18:34 UTC
Created attachment 74889 [details]
logfile from yast2

Here are the requested background info.
Just re-run the test (default kde-config) with same results. Because the original file is rather large (26MB) I filtered all statements with "resolver" and "queue: out.
If you need the complete file, let me know.
Interesting part of the log, is that the Space calculation is re-checked several times, partitions are seen, but not used for the required space.

[YCP] Packages.ycp:772 Resetting space calculation
[YCP] SpaceCalculation.ycp:297 available partition: mount: /usr, free: 10480640 KB, used: 0
[YCP] SpaceCalculation.ycp:510 Partition "/" needs 1.67 GB more disk space.
[YCP] Packages.ycp:775 Disk space sufficient: false
Comment 5 Matthias Eckermann 2006-03-24 11:57:26 UTC
Hi Hans,
I just came over your report: in my view, it is the same as bug #159322
(reported by me) and bug #158785 (reported by Eberhard Moenkeberg).
As #158785 is the oldest one, yours and mine are marked as duplicates.
Hope, you agree.
Best regards - MgE

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 158785 ***
Comment 6 Hans Witvliet 2006-03-25 16:50:26 UTC
Yes, you are right.
My apologies for the double entry, thought i searched bugzilla enough before reporting.
Keep a firm state about the "blocking nature"