Bug 160825 - Progress bar flickers (2)
Summary: Progress bar flickers (2)
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 60867
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Installation (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 8
Hardware: x86 Linux
: P5 - None : Enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jiri Srain
QA Contact: Stanislav Visnovsky
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-26 11:23 UTC by Jan Engelhardt
Modified: 2007-09-29 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Beta-Customer
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
video to show glitch (149.15 KB, video/x-msvideo)
2006-03-26 11:24 UTC, Jan Engelhardt
Details
show glitch (378.94 KB, application/x-msvideo)
2006-03-27 15:19 UTC, Jan Engelhardt
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Engelhardt 2006-03-26 11:23:13 UTC
A possible follow-up to #105485:

I have observed some sort of flicker (it could be seen as such) - with the 80x25 install (also happens in X11 install IIRC). The attached video file (rec. with VMware) shows this:

bc-1.06 at 100%
binutils-2.15 at 100%
binutils-2.15 at 0%, 6%, 21%, 25%, 27%, etc.
coreutils-5.93 at 100%
coreutils-5.93 at 0%, etc.

This happens with every package. It seems like a screen update is done too early.
Comment 1 Jan Engelhardt 2006-03-26 11:24:22 UTC
Created attachment 75031 [details]
video to show glitch
Comment 2 Michael Gross 2006-03-27 14:22:49 UTC
Sorry I cannot play that format here. What exactly does flicker? It's probably due to massive widget-updates, this problem is generally known.
Comment 3 Jan Engelhardt 2006-03-27 15:16:35 UTC
As said, when a package is fully installed, the gauge is set to 0%, then a screen update happens (so we actually see the gauge going to 0%), and only then the new package name is displayed. So at best, we would just need to get rid of the screen update between changing the gauge's value and changing the package name labels.
Comment 4 Jan Engelhardt 2006-03-27 15:19:06 UTC
Created attachment 75155 [details]
show glitch

Does an MEncoder-lavc-ffmpeg4 (`mencoder -ovc lavc`) encoded version help more than vmware-codec-coded one for you?
Comment 5 Michael Gross 2006-03-29 10:47:41 UTC
Reassigning to Jiri.
Comment 6 Stefan Hundhammer 2006-05-30 10:31:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 60867 ***