Bug 161307 - bash_completion missing in SL?
Summary: bash_completion missing in SL?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Selections (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 8
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ruediger Oertel
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 144304
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-03-28 11:38 UTC by Martin Mrazik
Modified: 2006-03-29 09:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Mrazik 2006-03-28 11:38:06 UTC
I'm missing the bash_completion package in my beta8 installation quite much. Is this intented? 

It seems that the DVD version has bash-completion. However I was unable to find it on the CDs.

and what about sles10?
Comment 1 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-28 15:48:07 UTC
Probably because of lack of space?
Comment 2 Ruediger Oertel 2006-03-28 23:13:21 UTC
sles10 most definitely not, I don't think we want to actively maintain
this for all of SLES10 (platforms/lifetime)

for SL ... AJ ?
Comment 3 Andreas Jaeger 2006-03-29 06:33:03 UTC
Let's leave it out, we cannot add everything and this is not used that much AFAIK.
Comment 4 Martin Mrazik 2006-03-29 08:52:21 UTC
This is your decision. But what I think is that almost every bash user is using bash-completion. Just because once you start using it you can't stop. 

Other reason why to have this is that this package is really tiny (64k). Actually I don't even understand why is this not included in bash.rpm (at least in Debian it is so). But as I said - your decision....
Comment 5 Andreas Jaeger 2006-03-29 09:22:38 UTC
The package is in no selection, so users will not notice it.  If it's that important it should be installed by default.

I'm not adding it for 10.1.