Bug 188557 - Mozilla Thunderbir segfault
Summary: Mozilla Thunderbir segfault
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 157078
Alias: None
Product: SUSE Linux 10.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Firefox (show other bugs)
Version: Final
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-27 11:49 UTC by Michal Zugec
Modified: 2006-06-28 06:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
strace output (630.18 KB, text/plain)
2006-06-27 11:49 UTC, Michal Zugec
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michal Zugec 2006-06-27 11:49:07 UTC
After upgrage from 10.0 to 10.1 firefox and thunderbird segfaults on start.
When I make a fresh installation, works fine until I update gimp package. Now I'am not able to start thunderbird.

$ thunderbird
/usr/bin/thunderbird: line 137:  7150 Segmentation fault      $AOSS $MOZ_PROGRAM $@

Return code is 139. On this line there are variables starts this:
"/usr/bin/aoss /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird-bin"
I attache strace output of this
Comment 1 Michal Zugec 2006-06-27 11:49:59 UTC
Created attachment 91723 [details]
strace output
Comment 2 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-06-27 18:43:46 UTC
just a first wild guess: do you use LDAP user authentication or LDAP uid service via nss_ldap?

If not, could you please try to get a backtrace?
Comment 3 Michal Zugec 2006-06-28 06:07:36 UTC
Yes I use LDAP for user authentication. It means you don't need backtrace?
According bug #153444 - I don't use Network Manager, I uninstall qt-gtk package
Comment 4 Michal Zugec 2006-06-28 06:11:25 UTC
Update - I think this is duplicate of #157078 (that's why Wolfgang ask me about LDAP?)
Workarroud - using package from FC5 works fine. I hope this will be fixed later.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 157078 ***
Comment 5 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2006-06-28 06:14:29 UTC
yes, it's a duplicate and I don't really understand why the package from FC5 should work fine. It shouldn't make a difference since it's a design problem.