219923 – Installation-DVD's catalogue is labeled "20061110-165311" instead of a meaningful label like "Installation-DVD"

Bug 219923 - Installation-DVD's catalogue is labeled "20061110-165311" instead of a meaningful label like "Installation-DVD"

Summary: Installation-DVD's catalogue is labeled "20061110-165311" instead of a meanin...

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 220195

Alias:	None

Product:	openSUSE 10.2
Classification:	openSUSE
Component:	Installation (show other bugs)
Version:	Beta 2
Hardware:	Other Other

Priority:	P5 - None Severity: Enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Duncan Mac-Vicar
QA Contact:	Jiri Srain

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Clone This Bug

Reported:	2006-11-10 16:26 UTC by Forgotten User --EoyBps8f
Modified:	2006-12-11 23:54 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By:	Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---
IT Deployment:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Forgotten User --EoyBps8f 2006-11-10 16:26:53 UTC

I did a fresh install of SuSE 10.2 beta2 and afterwards yast asked me for "20061110-165311 CD1". It might be sensible to mediate to the user a more meaningful name describing the media's content, e.g. "Installation-DVD".

Comment 1 Matej Horvath 2006-11-15 10:00:10 UTC

When exactly did it asked you for the CD/DVD?

Comment 2 Forgotten User --EoyBps8f 2006-11-15 10:08:09 UTC

Every time I install something via YaST. But also in Zen, the catalogue is labled "20061110-165311". How is the user supposed to know that this is the Installation DVD?

Comment 3 Ruediger Oertel 2006-11-17 13:26:43 UTC

Duncan, where is that string generated any why isn't the LABEL from the
content file used there ?

Comment 4 Andreas Hanke 2006-12-11 23:54:21 UTC

And why has this serious and annoying bug/regression been downgraded into an enhancement?

This is not an enhancement, something doesn't work as it should and therefore it's a bug. Is it really necessary to turn every single report from the community into minor or an enhancement?

In the duplicate bug 220195 comment 9, the project management even asked for an online update for this. And the number of duplicates is astonishing, everyone can see that this is not an enhancement. It's a most annoying bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 220195 ***