Bug 459054 - ListView_details: "tree table" has extraneous "table cell" child
Summary: ListView_details: "tree table" has extraneous "table cell" child
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: UI Automation
Classification: Mono
Component: Winforms - General (show other bugs)
Version: Release 0.9
Hardware: x86 openSUSE 11.0
: P4 - Low : Minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-12-15 11:07 UTC by calen chen
Modified: 2009-03-19 14:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description calen chen 2008-12-15 11:07:31 UTC 
SUMMARY

in samples/listview_details.py, there is one extraneous "table cell" child under "tree table"

REPRO

1.  run uia2atk/test/samples/listview_detail.py 
2.  expand "ipy", see children under "tree table" 

RESULTS

there is one extraneous "table cell"

EXPECTED RESUlt

I think all children in listview_details.py under "tree table" are "table cell" like children in samples/gtkliststore.py, now we bridge them to "check box" and "text", so "Default Group" table cell is extraneous.
Comment 1 Mario Carrion 2009-03-16 13:56:11 UTC 
"Default Group" is the default group all items belong to, expanding "Accessible" will show "Default Group" in Relations for each TableCell and CheckBox.

About gtklistore.py, yes this control used to be based on gtklistore.py but the specification was wrong and now we are using the valid widget: gtktreeview.py.
Comment 2 calen chen 2009-03-17 03:49:14 UTC 
Hi Mario, I think I understand what you said, but still have one question that in gtktreeview.py 'Accessible' shows "TreeTable" in relations for each 'TableCell' that there is no 'Default Group', do they have any difference? it's not a big problem, don't worry I reopen it :) thanks your explanation!
Comment 3 Mario Carrion 2009-03-19 14:34:58 UTC 
Hello Calen,

Well, I'm seeing that for each "child X of parent X" relations will show the "parent X" is that what you meant?