Bug 538859 - X.org built-in configuration won't let me utilize full resolutions when using two displays
Summary: X.org built-in configuration won't let me utilize full resolutions when using...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 538858
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 11.2
Classification: openSUSE
Component: X.Org (show other bugs)
Version: Milestone 7
Hardware: All Other
: P5 - None : Major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Forgotten User Wum0mkMcd8
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-14 02:20 UTC by Jeff Mahoney
Modified: 2009-09-14 02:21 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
Screen shot of failed display dialog (439.50 KB, image/png)
2009-09-14 02:20 UTC, Jeff Mahoney
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeff Mahoney 2009-09-14 02:20:43 UTC
Created attachment 318028 [details]
Screen shot of failed display dialog

My workstation is a notebook (Thinkpad T60p) with two external displays. One is connected via external VGA and the other is connected via external DVI-D. In the past, I've had to keep a copy of my manually-edited xorg.conf in order to get the displays to work as expected. Milestone 7 appears not to require an xorg.conf at all, which is pretty awesome.

The way my system has been configured for the past two years is to have the DVI-D display on the left with a resolution of 1680x1050 and the VGA monitor on the right with a resolution of 1600x1200. The internal display is turned off.

The configuration that it chooses limits the frame buffer to 2560x2560. Attempts to resize the screen via xrandr fail:

jeffm@galileo:~> xrandr --fb 3280x1280
xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 2560x2560 (desired size 3280x1280)

Likewise, attempts configure it this way using the GNOME tool fail. I've attached a screen shot.

The displays are limited to both being 1280x1024, which reaches the 2560 horizontal limit.
Comment 1 Jeff Mahoney 2009-09-14 02:21:37 UTC
Stupid gateway timeout ended up getting this filed twice.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 538858 ***