Bug 545560 - CTRL + ALT + L keybindings lost after upgrade to latest factory
Summary: CTRL + ALT + L keybindings lost after upgrade to latest factory
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 547565
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 11.2
Classification: openSUSE
Component: GNOME (show other bugs)
Version: RC 1
Hardware: 32bit SUSE Other
: P5 - None : Major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-08 21:20 UTC by Forgotten User zhFaldehF_
Modified: 2009-10-22 12:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Forgotten User zhFaldehF_ 2009-10-08 21:20:51 UTC 
User-Agent:       Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00

GNOME 2.28.0
CTRL + ALT + L to lock the workstation no longer works after upgrade.. (key binding was lost).. I haven't tried to reconfigure it yet.. but just a note.. 

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Press CTRL+AL+DEL
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
Doesn't Lock X Screen

Expected Results:  
Lock X
Comment 1 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-10-08 21:22:45 UTC 
Same question as on IRC: are you running compiz or metacity?
Comment 2 Forgotten User zhFaldehF_ 2009-10-08 21:48:18 UTC 
Compiz
Comment 3 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-10-09 17:10:08 UTC 
I can also reproduce this using metacity, thus I don't think this time it's a compiz issue.
Comment 4 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-10-10 14:02:01 UTC 
Same error when running gnome-shell.
Comment 5 Forgotten User zhFaldehF_ 2009-10-17 15:46:39 UTC 
Changing from M8 to RC1, changing to Major.. Other losses in hot keys / keyboard funcitonality is not known by me.. Dominique have you seen other lost features ie multimedia keyboard?
Comment 6 Vincent Untz 2009-10-19 08:41:37 UTC 
Maybe we should just close as dup of bug 547565 (which is more generic)?
Comment 7 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-10-22 12:38:31 UTC 
I think marking as DUP og bug 547565  is the correct solution here.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 547565 ***