Bug 681107 - Buildservice could be smarter and allow to upload a whole src.rpm
Summary: Buildservice could be smarter and allow to upload a whole src.rpm
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE.org
Classification: openSUSE
Component: BuildService (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: VMWare Other
: P4 - Low : Enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adrian Schröter
QA Contact: Adrian Schröter
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-20 12:20 UTC by Michael Scherer
Modified: 2012-05-22 02:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: Community User
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Scherer 2011-03-20 12:20:15 UTC
While testing the buildservice with one of my rpm, I uploaded a src.rpm as a file with the web interface, and tried to compile it. It didn't work. I think BuildService web interface could be smarter and either :
- detect this is a src.rpm, and open it to add every file, thus allowing easier upload of a complex upload ( asking to the user if this is what he want, of course )
- warn people that this is likely wrong ( even if I could see some reason to upload a src.rpm, like for example rpmlint, I suspect that it will not do what people want most of the time )
Comment 1 Adrian Schröter 2011-03-21 06:31:16 UTC
The webui had code to do exactly this (using download_src_package source service when a src.rpm gets added).

Sascha, is this gone ?
Comment 2 Michael Scherer 2011-03-21 11:07:43 UTC
The service is still here, but it wasn't added with my test. I have added it by hand once I found out later ( after posting the bug report ), but I was not sure on how to use it.
Comment 3 Sascha Peilicke 2011-03-21 14:57:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The webui had code to do exactly this (using download_src_package source
> service when a src.rpm gets added).
> 
> Sascha, is this gone ?
Dunno, can't recall ever touching such code.