Bug 949254 - apache2-2.4.6-6.50.1 security update breaks suexec
Summary: apache2-2.4.6-6.50.1 security update breaks suexec
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 949218
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 13.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Apache (show other bugs)
Version: Final
Hardware: Other Other
: P5 - None : Major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-10-07 13:36 UTC by Markus Kolb
Modified: 2015-10-08 10:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: Yes
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Markus Kolb 2015-10-07 13:36:06 UTC
Hi,

web applications using suexec or based on suexec like suphp are showing strange behaviour after updating to apache2-2.4.6-6.50.1

Snippet from https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/333916:

After updating to this patch release, more complex php-pages are mostly empty in response or sometime a bunch of the first response lines are not transmitted (the page doesn't start with DOCTYPE...html tag, but somewhere in the body). In few requests the page is transmitted not as text/html but another content-type so that the browser shows download dialogue. Very strange and different behaviour, but reproducible and after downgrading to the release from June everything works again. I've tried a recompilation of the modsuphp module, but the result has no changes to the older build and build.opensuse.org throws away the build. So this shouldn't be the root of the problem. I've also no clue what might be the problem, because there is no error or warning in any log file about the requests.

Maybe a relation to https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=949218
Comment 1 Markus Kolb 2015-10-07 13:41:44 UTC
I've same strange behaviour with perl cgi application using suexec (suphp is also based on suexec).
Comment 2 Markus Kolb 2015-10-08 10:21:05 UTC
You are in #949218 on the right way ;-)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 949218 ***